help | home | search messages | profile

@home Message Board

Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Feedback request: Potamogeton alpinus (6450)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
David Price



Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 2214

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:37 pm    Post subject: Feedback request: Potamogeton alpinus (6450) Reply with quote

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #232670

Taxon:Potamogeton alpinus Balb. ("Red Pondweed")
named by George Taylor & James Edgar Dandy 1943
Filed in taxon folder:Potamogeton alpinus Balb. ("Red Pondweed")
Collected by:Mr Charles Bailey
Collection date:21/10/1882
Locality:Great Britain, VC58 Cheshire, Mobberley, SJ78, Pit between Mobberley and Ashley.
ex herb:Mr Charles Bailey
Institution:Manchester Museum (MANCH)
Accession number:Kk803
Image:Potamogeton alpinus herbarium specimen from Mobberley, VC58 Cheshire in 1882 by Mr Charles Bailey.

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by daniel king on 5th April 2007.

Checked by keith barnett

Edit history

dateuserchange
22/05/2007daniel kingReplaced number:
08/12/2008tom humphrey (bulk edit)Deleted determiner: (James Edgar Dandy and G. Taylor)
08/12/2008tom humphrey (bulk edit)Added determiner: James Edgar Dandy
08/12/2008tom humphrey (bulk edit)Added determiner: George Taylor

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.


User comments about this sheet

wonastow wrote
why doesn't this form have a field for flowering status?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Humphrey
Site Admin


Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 1298
Location: Wallingford, UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure, it's not an intentional ommission. There are various different templates in use for the doc form, which have subtle differences. E.g. the Manchester version includes an accession number field.

I'll investigate this tonight.

regards,

Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group